Subject: [Beowulf] Re: SGE + policy
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Steve Cousins cousins at limpet.umeoce.maine.eduFri May 28 13:56:25 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] KVM to a compute node
- Next message: [Beowulf] harmonic mitigators vs PFC?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 28 May 2004 beowulf-request at beowulf.org wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2004, Andrew Piskorski wrote: > > > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 12:01:09PM -0700, beowulf-request at beowulf.org wrote: > > > > > Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 10:19:00 -0400 (EDT) > > > From: "Robert G. Brown" <rgb at phy.duke.edu> > > > > > Primary tasks: matlab and stata jobs, run either interactively/remote > > > or (more likely) in batch mode. Jobs include both "short" jobs that > > > > > Constraint: matlab requires a license managed by a license manager. I don't know if the proposed cluster is using dual CPU's but I believe you can run multiple Matlab sessions on one node and use only one license. So if you had two CPU's you could run two sessions (and more probably if you had a bunch of interactive sessions) and use only one license. This would at least drop the number of licenses needed in half. So, depending on what the Matlab licenses cost these days maybe it would be cheaper to get a bunch of 8 CPU Opterons :^o Steve ______________________________________________________________________ Steve Cousins, Ocean Modeling Group Email: cousins at umit.maine.edu Marine Sciences, 208 Libby Hall http://rocky.umeoce.maine.edu Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469 Phone: (207) 581-4302
- Previous message: [Beowulf] KVM to a compute node
- Next message: [Beowulf] harmonic mitigators vs PFC?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
