[Beowulf] raw ethernet
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Keith D. Underwood kdunder at sandia.govSat Jul 24 06:41:00 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] raw ethernet
- Next message: [Beowulf] DIMMnet-1 DIMM slot NIC?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> are connected by a point-to-point gigabit link). I'm interested in > understand why I have a packet loss (interrupt management, full rx ring, > rx buffer overflow, each of them combined?) Now I'm trying to modulate the You lose packets because you can. That sounds sarcastic, but it is the very unfortunate reality. I have a bit of low level GigE experience and I am pretty sure that is the primary reason. For example, say you have a high end GigE switch that guarantees sub-5 microsecond LIFO latency. Now, assume you have enabled flow control (yes, flow control was defined in the GigE spec) and that you know the cards have a decent amount of buffer. Next, simultaneously send 35 packets to one destination with origins distributed evenly among 7 sources. Want to know what will happen? Most of those packets will get dropped. Why? They switch should have enough buffer to handle that. Well... as best I could tell, the answer is that ethernet can drop packets (it is defined as an unreliable protocol) and the switch recognized a momentary flood that prevented it from meeting latency guarantees, so it started dropping packets. Because the protocol is inherently unreliable, "drop" is a valid design decision at any point along the path. Keith
- Previous message: [Beowulf] raw ethernet
- Next message: [Beowulf] DIMMnet-1 DIMM slot NIC?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
