Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] raw ethernet

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Keith D. Underwood kdunder at sandia.gov
Sat Jul 24 06:41:00 PDT 2004


> are connected by a point-to-point gigabit link). I'm interested in
> understand why I have a packet loss (interrupt management, full rx ring,
> rx buffer overflow, each of them combined?) Now I'm trying to modulate the

You lose packets because you can.  That sounds sarcastic, but it is the
very unfortunate reality.  I have a bit of  low level GigE experience
and I am pretty sure that is the primary reason.  

For example, say you have a high end GigE switch that guarantees sub-5
microsecond LIFO latency.  Now, assume you have enabled flow control
(yes, flow control was defined in the GigE spec) and that you know the
cards have a decent amount of buffer.  Next, simultaneously send 35
packets to one destination with origins distributed evenly among 7
sources.  Want to know what will happen?  Most of those packets will get
dropped.  Why?  They switch should have enough buffer to handle that. 
Well... as best I could tell, the answer is that ethernet can drop
packets (it is defined as an unreliable protocol) and the switch
recognized a momentary flood that prevented it from meeting latency
guarantees, so it started dropping packets.  Because the protocol is
inherently unreliable, "drop" is a valid design decision at any point
along the path.

					Keith





More information about the Beowulf mailing list