[Beowulf] Intel compilers V8
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Serguei.Patchkovskii at sympatico.ca Serguei.Patchkovskii at sympatico.caThu Jul 15 17:36:37 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Intel compilers V8
- Next message: [Beowulf] Intel compilers V8
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12 Jul 2004 at 8:34, John Hearns wrote: > For those who use them, are most people using version 8 of the > Intel compilers? Are there any known issues? For production work, I would recommend against using version 8 of the intel compilers. They sort of work, provided that you get the most recent update from Intel support - however, there are still many issues with numerical accuracy at high optimization levels. To intel's credit, this is a huge improvement compared to the original 8.0 release - that one was either crashing or producing wrong code for most non-trivial applications. Unless your code is very similar to one of the SPEC benchmarks, 8.0 may also generate slower code, compared to ifc 7.1, even though 8.0 presumably includes much better high-level optimizers. The nice debugging features (try -C -d2, and you'll see waht I mean) of 7.1 are largerly missing in 8.0, too. I also gave up on OpenMP in 8.0, while 7.1's is working fine (but is limited to OMP 1.1). To put it very mildly, 8.0 is not an improvement over 7.1 Serguei
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Intel compilers V8
- Next message: [Beowulf] Intel compilers V8
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
