[Beowulf] Benchmark reality check please
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.govWed Dec 22 20:06:07 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Benchmark reality check please
- Next message: [Beowulf] Monitoring & using Cluster thru Internet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: <steve_heaton at ozemail.com.au> To: <beowulf at beowulf.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 6:40 PM Subject: [Beowulf] Benchmark reality check please > G'day all > > I'm not looking to start another fight over benchmarking... really I'm not! ;) > > > My proposed benchmark suite looks like this: > > That RGB fellow's BenchMaster suite would seem to give the CPU/RAM side of things a good workout. I'll give that a burl. Until recently LMBench seemed the go but BenchMaster seems to be a step up (more flexible)? (Someone *other* than RGB's opinion would be nice =P ) Maybe the Netpipe suit for all sorts of juicy network numbers? > > I'm not looking to kick heads on compilers. Ye olde "g" compilers will be the start point. Maybe a review of the Intel flavours (if they're still free for non-profit/personal/educational type usage) later on. If I've got to pay for more than download bandwidth then it's out. I'm eating tomato sauce sandwiches after the hardware purchases as it is! :) > > I was thinking about the various MPI options and how to put them through the wringer too. I suspect the wall clock time on the Nbody runs will be the easiest number. > > What will I do with the results? As I mentioned, this is a baseline ie. What do the numbers look like now? ...then it's off to the sandpit... Tweaking, tweaking and more tweaking. Running the same benchmark suite as I go. Was the tweak a net gain? You, know... the sort of thing that **real** benchmarks are used for! =) I've always been intrigued by the HINT benchmark stuff. It produces a graph of (essentially) speed vs problem size, and shows up things like where the cache starts missing, etc. I haven't seen much recent development on HINT. The only reference I could find recently was a mirror of the old HINT website. Basically, the problem is a numerical integration of something, where the step size is continually made finer and finer (i.e. more and more slices) I just googled and found: http://hint.byu.edu/ ... there's a PVM version at http://hint.byu.edu/pub/HINT/source/parallel/pvm/ See also: http://hint.byu.edu/pub/HINT/source/doc/porting-guide.html > > Thoughts, comments appreciated as always. > > Cheers > Stevo > > This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Benchmark reality check please
- Next message: [Beowulf] Monitoring & using Cluster thru Internet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
