[Beowulf] AMD64 results...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joshua Baker-LePain jlb17 at duke.eduThu Dec 16 06:05:53 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] AMD64 results...
- Next message: [Beowulf] AMD64 results...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 at 8:08am, Robert G. Brown wrote
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Bill Broadley wrote:
>
> > Group reply:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 05:49:09PM -0500, Robert G. Brown wrote:
> > > Just for those of you who were asking after AMD64's as viable compute
> > > platforms, I just ran stream and the bogomflops benchmark in my renamed
> > > "benchmaster" (was cpu_rate) shell on both a 2.4 GHz AMD64 3400+
> >
> > That is a s754 amd64?
>
> Yes (as per earlier discussion, an Asus K8NE, but I should have restated
> it -- the P2 is an MSI mobo but I'm downstairs and don't remember which
> one). ^^
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it
means.
\end[castilian]{accent}
Didn't your initial post state that the Intel CPU tested was a
"GenuineIntel Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.80GHz at 1804.509 (MHz)"? Or
am I missing something (I haven't had my coffee yet, you see)?
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
- Previous message: [Beowulf] AMD64 results...
- Next message: [Beowulf] AMD64 results...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
