[Beowulf] Raid disk read performance issue in Linux 2.6, anyone seen this?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tim Mattox tmattox at gmail.comThu Dec 9 07:58:25 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Raid disk read performance issue in Linux 2.6, anyone seen this?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Password less ssh
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello Craig, This just released article from LWN may shed some light on your IO performance issues with the 2.6 kernel: "Which is the fairest I/O scheduler of them all?" http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/ That is currently a subscriber only article, but will be available to all on December 16th. (I highly recommend a subscription, LWN is a fantastic resource.) You should look into which IO scheduler works best for your workload. The 2.6 kernel has a few to choose from... Also, you may be interested in the latest CentOS 3.3 distribution, since it has an actively supported x86_64 port. The upcoming cAos-2 distribution is also worth a look for x86-64 users... for info about both see: http://caosity.org/ On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 17:10:40 +0100 (CET), Bogdan Costescu <bogdan.costescu at iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Craig Tierney wrote: > > > I meant White Box distribution which is a rebuild of Red Hat Enterprise > > 3. It was an early release for Opteron and Itanium. Since then, > > the Gelato Foundation has taken over the rebuilds and should be > > available. > > I don't think that this is "official" WhiteBox Linux. Their web page > only mentions x86 and x86_86 architectures. They might even don't know > about it... ;-) > The guy that initially built WhiteBox x64_64 and ia64, Pasi Pirhonen, > is now their TaoLinux maintainer (along with s390(x)). > > > It isn't exact, but every single 2.6 based system I have tried > > has shown this problem. Every 2.4 based system has not shown this > > problem. > > It is indeed strange... > > > I primarily used lmdd to test the performance of the filesystem. All > > I care about is big streaming IO. > > ext3 and xfs (at least) care about the underlying sector size or RAID > stripe size. Have you paid attention to this when you formatted the > device (if you formatted after moving to the new computers) ? Do you > use something else between the physical device and the file-system, > like lvm (lvm1 in 2.4, lvm2 in 2.6) or software RAID ? > > > I did try sgpdd which accesses the device directly and I saw the > > same behavior. > > I never heard of this tool. A simple search also didn't found > anything. Care to provide a link ? > Could you run hdparm/zcav/dd/etc. reading directly from real SCSI > device (no lv*, md*) ? Yes, I know, some of these tools are not very > precise, but we're talking about almost an order of magnitude... > > > > -- > Bogdan Costescu > > IWR - Interdisziplinaeres Zentrum fuer Wissenschaftliches Rechnen > Universitaet Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY > Telephone: +49 6221 54 8869, Telefax: +49 6221 54 8868 > E-mail: Bogdan.Costescu at IWR.Uni-Heidelberg.De > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -- Tim Mattox - tmattox at gmail.com - http://homepage.mac.com/tmattox/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Raid disk read performance issue in Linux 2.6, anyone seen this?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Password less ssh
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
