[Beowulf] 96 Processors Under Your Desktop (fwd from brian-slashdotnews@hyperreal.org)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.govMon Aug 30 14:18:38 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 96 Processors Under Your Desktop (fwd from brian-slashdotnews@hyperreal.org)
- Next message: [Beowulf] 96 Processors Under Your Desktop (fwd from brian-slashdotnews@hyperreal.org)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 02:08 PM 8/30/2004 -0400, Russell Nordquist wrote: >I find two things interesting. 1) The top brass at Orion are from >Transmeta 2) This is not shared memory setup, but ethernet connected. So >latency will be an issue.... > >Does anyone have any idea haw the Efficeon's stack up against Opterons? >A quad cpu opteron comes in at a similar price as Orion's 12 cpu unit, >but the opeteon is a faster chips and has shared mem. The Orion DT-12 >lists a 16 Gflop linpack. Does anyone have quad Opteron linpack results? >russell More to the point, given the market that Orion is selling into (offices), what's the power consumption and noise level of the quad opteron? If Orion has 96 processors and you use your 4 Opteron/12 Efficeon ratio, that's like 32 opterons (i.e. 8 quads). If opterons are 100W each, that's 3200W, which is quite a bit more than the 1500-1800W the Orion box is shooting for. James Lux, P.E. Spacecraft Telecommunications Section Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 161-213 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena CA 91109 tel: (818)354-2075 fax: (818)393-6875
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 96 Processors Under Your Desktop (fwd from brian-slashdotnews@hyperreal.org)
- Next message: [Beowulf] 96 Processors Under Your Desktop (fwd from brian-slashdotnews@hyperreal.org)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
