diskless node + g98?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Martin Siegert siegert at sfu.caThu Jan 23 10:29:31 PST 2003
- Previous message: diskless node + g98?
- Next message: diskless node + g98?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:43:29AM -0600, lmathew at okstate.edu wrote: > Beowulf list readers: > > I have a Beowulf cluster (12 diskless nodes, 1 fileserver/master) with > 26 processors (total) that is configured to run computational simulations > in both parallel and serial (pretty standard for this list). I am > interested in utilizing my cluster to run a series of serial g98 > calculations on each node. These calcualtions (as many of you know) > require a "scratch" space. How can this scratch space be provided to a > diskless node? Here are a few options that I have identified. I am running a 96 node (192 processor) cluster as a multi-purpose research facility for a university. I have a lot of g98 jobs running on that cluster. All of my nodes have /tmp on a local disk with 15GB of scratch space. > 1). Mount a LARGE ram drive? (1GB in size if possible??) Almost certainly not good enough: most of the g98 jobs that I see on my cluster need more than 1GB of scratch space. > 2). Install hard disk drives in each of the slave nodes? (unattractive) By far the best solution. > 3). Use a drive mounted via NFS/PVNFS? (large amount of communication) Very bad. I first (because I did not know anything about g98) had g98 configured such that it would write its scratch files to the user's home directory over NFS. This did not only drive the performance of the g98 towards 0, but what is worse it made life miserable for everybody on the cluster (NFS timeouts, etc.). > Has anyone encountered this? If so...what was the workaround that was > implemented? I am open to any suggestions and comments. :) I am going to stick my head out here: configuring a multi-purpose cluster with diskless nodes is a misconfiguration. Only if you know that you'll never run a job with significant I/O on your cluster you could consider going diskless. Otherwise: stay away from that. (you could install a high-performance file server on your cluster - we actually have a Netapp NFS server - but for g98 your network becomes the bottleneck. Furthermore, this is definitely more expensive than installing local disks ...) Just my $0.02 Martin ======================================================================== Martin Siegert Academic Computing Services phone: (604) 291-4691 Simon Fraser University fax: (604) 291-4242 Burnaby, British Columbia email: siegert at sfu.ca Canada V5A 1S6 ========================================================================
- Previous message: diskless node + g98?
- Next message: diskless node + g98?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
