MPI vs PVM
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David Farrell farrelde at clarkson.eduThu Jan 9 11:38:36 PST 2003
- Previous message: MPI vs PVM
- Next message: FW: xCAT Cluster Management SW?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodrigo F. Baroni" <rodrigobaroni at yahoo.com.br> To: <beowulf at beowulf.org> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:25 PM Subject: MPI vs PVM > Hello all, > > > I have to do a choice between MPI or PVM to use to > develop image processing aplications . > > After to do this choice and start to study a lot, > could someone tell me some sugestion ? This would be > very useful .. > > > Thanks > > Rodrigo F Baroni > > Computer Science Grad Student > Image Science Centre and Medical Phisics > Universidade of Sao Paulo State, Brazil > Rodrigo- I prefer the MPI standard, there are many implementations available, (for me) it was easier to configure, install and run. It is portable and well maintained. Have you, looked into OpenMOSIX? It is a process migration method, but is currently suited for Intel 32 bit architecture only ( - http://openmosix.sourceforge.net/) Dave F.
- Previous message: MPI vs PVM
- Next message: FW: xCAT Cluster Management SW?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
