Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jeffrey B. Layton laytonjb at bellsouth.netMon Feb 10 14:41:51 PST 2003
- Previous message: Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?
- Next message: Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Lindahl wrote: >On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:24:07AM -0800, Nicholas Webb wrote: > > > >>At the University of Idaho we are preparing to order a new beowulf cluster >>and a vendor seemed to be shocked that we wanted UPSs attached to ALL of >>the nodes. >> >> > >Most clusters I've worked on have had UPSes on all of the nodes. Among other >reasons, it's an easy way to make sure your power is clean. > >greg > Greg has a point. However, for us, we would rather have more nodes than UPSes. We problems that UPSes might not solve (like maintenance guys who flick power switches on the main panel or people who unplug power cords - UPSes don't help too much in those cases :) So far with a total of somewhere near 700 nodes in various cluster, for about 2+ years, we haven't had any problems. Jeff > >_______________________________________________ >Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org >To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > > >
- Previous message: Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?
- Next message: Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
