Performance evaluation
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Brian Haymore brian at chpc.utah.eduFri Sep 20 15:39:55 PDT 2002
- Previous message: Performance evaluation
- Next message: Performance evaluation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We run mm5 jobs here at the Univ of Utah. In our initial tests we found mm5 to need a lower latency network then ethernet seems to offer. We currently run over Giganet's VIA hardware at a 2x speedup over our initial runs over ethernet. We also tested Myrinet, though an older rev then the 2000 product, and found similar speedups. I can get you more detailed info if you need it, let me know. On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 15:02, Paul English wrote: > > We are running MM5 on a 12 node, 24 processor cluster. It does not seem to > be running at full capacity and I'd like to figure out where we can get > the most bang/buck on performance improvements. The network is currently > only single 10/100, although the motherboards (Tyan S2462 w/ dual onboard > 3c920) have a second 10/100 interface. > > I need to look at: > How saturated is the network? > Do I need to double (2nd 10/100) or multiply by 10 (gigabit) the throughput? > Is the problem latency based? > > > Thanks, > Paul > > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf -- Brian D. Haymore University of Utah Center for High Performance Computing 155 South 1452 East RM 405 Salt Lake City, Ut 84112-0190 Phone: (801) 585-1755, Fax: (801) 585-5366 http://www.map.utah.edu/umaplink/0019.html
- Previous message: Performance evaluation
- Next message: Performance evaluation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
