MS attacking government use of "open source"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rivera, Angel R Angel.R.Rivera at conoco.comThu May 23 09:18:12 PDT 2002
- Previous message: Want to build web cluster server
- Next message: MS attacking government use of "open source"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
A number of reasons I can think of-including: First they tried to get around GPL so they could use the open source but close off any changed/"enhancements" they make from the public-so now they are gunning for GPL. And perhaps they are afraid that the Govt will force them as part of the anti-trust case to make sources or sections of source available. SecurityFocus just had an article on why M$ should not open source their software. -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Shewmaker [mailto:shewa at inel.gov] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:14 AM To: Bob Drzyzgula Cc: beowulf at beowulf.org; linuxbios at lanl.gov Subject: Re: MS attacking government use of "open source" On Thu, 23 May 2002 07:12:54 -0400 Bob Drzyzgula <bob at drzyzgula.org> wrote: > All of us using and supporting Linux in government > probably need to be somewhat concerned about this. The > Pentagon at least seems not to have been swayed so far, > but it's gone far enough for them to pay Mitre for a study > of the question. I'm not sure that all agencies would > be this steadfast. I find myself wanting to write letters to my representatives, etc., but then I think to myself that it will all work itself out. It may work itself out, but perhaps my real reason for not doing something is that I don't feel like it will make a difference. I'm from Idaho and this state appears to have little power to affect anything. Of course, not doing anything is a good way of guaranteeing that I don't have any affect. I plan on making my representatives aware of Peruvian Congressman Villanueva's bill and letter to Microsoft. http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-05-20-006-26-IN-LF-PB > "Microsoft has argued that some free-licensing > regimes are antithetical to the government's > stated policy that moneymaking applications > should develop from government-funded research > and that intellectual property should be > protected." I don't understand why many people (not just MS) are so adamantly opposed to the GPL. I know that the GPL is not for everything, but it is really a good license for the information age. Instead of paying for the right to use the software with money, a person simply pays with any source code modifications they make. Andrew -- Andrew Shewmaker Associate Engineer Phone: 208.526.1415 Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory 2525 Fremont Ave. P.O. Box 1625, MS 3605 Idaho Falls, ID 83414-3605 _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: Want to build web cluster server
- Next message: MS attacking government use of "open source"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
