Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

MS attacking government use of "open source"

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Rivera, Angel R Angel.R.Rivera at conoco.com
Thu May 23 09:18:12 PDT 2002


A number of reasons I can think of-including: First they tried to get
around GPL so they could use the open source but close off any
changed/"enhancements" they make from the public-so now they are gunning
for GPL.  And perhaps they are afraid that the Govt will force them as
part of the anti-trust case to make sources or sections of source
available.
SecurityFocus just had an article on why M$ should not open source their
software.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Shewmaker [mailto:shewa at inel.gov]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Bob Drzyzgula
Cc: beowulf at beowulf.org; linuxbios at lanl.gov
Subject: Re: MS attacking government use of "open source"


On Thu, 23 May 2002 07:12:54 -0400
Bob Drzyzgula <bob at drzyzgula.org> wrote:

> All of us using and supporting Linux in government
> probably need to be somewhat concerned about this. The
> Pentagon at least seems not to have been swayed so far,
> but it's gone far enough for them to pay Mitre for a study
> of the question. I'm not sure that all agencies would
> be this steadfast.

I find myself wanting to write letters to my representatives, etc., but 
then I think to myself that it will all work itself out.  It may work 
itself out, but perhaps my real reason for not doing something is that 
I don't feel like it will make a difference.  I'm from Idaho and this 
state appears to have little power to affect anything.  Of course, not 
doing anything is a good way of guaranteeing that I don't have any 
affect.  I plan on making my representatives aware of Peruvian 
Congressman Villanueva's bill and letter to Microsoft.
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-05-20-006-26-IN-LF-PB


>    "Microsoft has argued that some free-licensing
>    regimes are antithetical to the government's
>    stated policy that moneymaking applications
>    should develop from government-funded research
>    and that intellectual property should be
>    protected."

I don't understand why many people (not just MS) are so adamantly 
opposed to the GPL.  I know that the GPL is not for everything, but 
it is really a good license for the information age.  Instead of paying 
for the right to use the software with money, a person simply pays with 
any source code modifications they make.

Andrew

-- 
Andrew Shewmaker
Associate Engineer
Phone:  208.526.1415

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
2525 Fremont Ave.
P.O. Box 1625, MS 3605
Idaho Falls, ID 83414-3605
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf



More information about the Beowulf mailing list