p4 v itinium
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Donald Becker becker at scyld.comFri May 17 14:23:00 PDT 2002
- Previous message: p4 v itinium
- Next message: rsh error running mpi code?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Josip Loncaric wrote: > ... > based on domain decomposition, the optimal amount of memory per node > grows very quickly as a function of the CPU/communication speed ratio. This comes as a surprise to many: as processor performance increases: the per node communication requirement grows less rapidly than expected, but the per node memory requirement grows faster than expected. > If you double the CPU speed but keep the same network, you can maintain > performance if your domain volume/surface ratio doubles as well. This > can happen if the volume (computations) grows by a factor of eight and > surface (communications) by a factor of four. In other words, per node > memory requirements can grow with the cube of the CPU/communication > speed ratio. This paragraph should be the canonical response when people ask about the future communication and memory needs on a cluster. Not every problem is a physical finite element grid, but that's the easiest mental model when explaining trends. -- Donald Becker becker at scyld.com Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com 410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Second Generation Beowulf Clusters Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993
- Previous message: p4 v itinium
- Next message: rsh error running mpi code?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
