sorry ... not cut through
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduWed May 15 14:20:13 PDT 2002
- Previous message: sorry ... not cut through
- Next message: sorry ... not cut through
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Josip Loncaric wrote: > Greg Lindahl wrote: > > > > You said this backwards: cutthrough switches ought to be better on > > latency. > > > > Cut-through vs. store-and-forward ought not affect bandwidth at all. > > I'd second that -- and add that an important reason why people build > store-and-forward switches despite (slightly) worse latencies is to > filter out malformed packets. Isolating such failures can save the > whole network from an expensive problem (e.g., lost business). Oops. <blush>Brain Fart</blush> rgb -- Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/ Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305 Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
- Previous message: sorry ... not cut through
- Next message: sorry ... not cut through
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
