sorry ... not cut through
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Josip Loncaric josip at icase.eduWed May 15 10:54:39 PDT 2002
- Previous message: sorry ... not cut through
- Next message: sorry ... not cut through
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Lindahl wrote: > > You said this backwards: cutthrough switches ought to be better on > latency. > > Cut-through vs. store-and-forward ought not affect bandwidth at all. I'd second that -- and add that an important reason why people build store-and-forward switches despite (slightly) worse latencies is to filter out malformed packets. Isolating such failures can save the whole network from an expensive problem (e.g., lost business). Sincerely, Josip -- Dr. Josip Loncaric, Research Fellow mailto:josip at icase.edu ICASE, Mail Stop 132C PGP key at http://www.icase.edu./~josip/ NASA Langley Research Center mailto:j.loncaric at larc.nasa.gov Hampton, VA 23681-2199, USA Tel. +1 757 864-2192 Fax +1 757 864-6134
- Previous message: sorry ... not cut through
- Next message: sorry ... not cut through
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
