opinion on XFS
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at keyresearch.comFri May 10 09:23:50 PDT 2002
- Previous message: opinion on XFS
- Next message: Help on benchmarking tests
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 08:06:41AM -0500, Roger L. Smith wrote: > I wasn't intending the quotations to be a direct quotation of anyone, I > was merely paraphrasing what the argument that several people are making > sounds like from where I'm sitting. Right. I still don't think *anyone* would agree with "XFS doesn't solve problems", but rather "XFS didn't solve your problem". What's the difference? The first can easily be interpreted as "XFS sucks", but the people making the statement mostly haven't touched XFS and won't touch XFS and don't have much of an opinion other than maybe "XFS doesn't fit elegantly with the Linux kernel". A subtle difference, but an important one. greg
- Previous message: opinion on XFS
- Next message: Help on benchmarking tests
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list