opinion on XFS
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at keyresearch.comFri May 10 00:26:21 PDT 2002
- Previous message: opinion on XFS
- Next message: opinion on XFS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:49:01PM -0500, Roger L. Smith wrote: > This is a bit of a circular argument. "XFS doesn't solve problems, it > just runs better on hardware that ext2 didn't work correctly on." I didn't say the first half of the quote. It's more fair to say that I don't think that ext2 is broken in general. I only have suspicions why XFS worked for you when you think ext2 did not. > Just so I don't sound like a complete XFS zealot (which I'm not), I do > have to say that I've been quite satisfied with the performance of ext3. ext3 should have all of the correctness problems you think you saw with ext2. greg
- Previous message: opinion on XFS
- Next message: opinion on XFS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list