opinion on XFS
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eray Ozkural erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.trThu May 9 20:30:07 PDT 2002
- Previous message: opinion on XFS
- Next message: opinion on XFS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tuesday 07 May 2002 21:51, Eray Ozkural wrote: > significantly. We used to suffer crashed nodes due to the extremely poorly > written EXT2 filesystem. That was the only system level bug that I wrote like that because as it should be apparent, that is my opinion. I wouldn't say such a thing if EXT2 hadn't consistently frustrated me in the past, on a variety of hardware. The only major flaw in the whole GNU/Linux system if I may say. [*] That's why I took the time to talk to people who used other filesystems, read their documents, and then convert all of my data to XFS which seemed to be the best filesystem 6 months ago. And I do think that EXT2 doesn't fare that well in the world of filesystems. Thank you all for taking the time to listen to my opinion. [*] There is also the performance of C++ dynamic linking but that's completely irrelevant ;) -- Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.tr> Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo Malfunction: http://mp3.com/ariza GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
- Previous message: opinion on XFS
- Next message: opinion on XFS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
