Because XFS is BETTER (Re: opinion on XFS)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
W Bauske wsb at paralleldata.comThu May 9 14:58:41 PDT 2002
- Previous message: Because XFS is BETTER (Re: opinion on XFS)
- Next message: To crash or not to crash
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Eray Ozkural wrote: > > It's very easy to crash a node with a suitable code, so I shouldn't have to > re-install it or manually fsck it every time it fails to reboot after such a > crash... > How do you "easily" crash a node. Are you exceeding some resource limit or?? I run quite large problems and don't see problems. Perhaps you mean performance grinds to a halt because of paging or something like that which makes the node un-responsive so you power cycle it. Wes
- Previous message: Because XFS is BETTER (Re: opinion on XFS)
- Next message: To crash or not to crash
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list