Debian 3.0
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Martin WHEELER mwheeler at startext.co.ukThu May 9 04:43:01 PDT 2002
- Previous message: Debian 3.0
- Next message: Debian 3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Manel Soria wrote: > Any positive/negative experiences with Debian 3.0 ? On a very simple 6-node project (each node running latest testing) -- no problems whatsoever. (Mind you, simple image-rendering isn't pushing the system to its limits for great lengths of time either, and I haven't run any sort of extensive benchmarking, or made any attempt to deliberately break anything.) No negative experiences either. > Also, on more general terms, it seems to me that the majority of Beowulfs are running > Red Hat. What are the reasons to prefer it to Debian ? rgb has just made a very eloquent argument for using what your in-house personnel are happiest with, and most knowledgeable about. (see list archive) Horses for courses. Whatever gets the job done fastest, with the least number of known disadvantages. msw -- Martin Wheeler <mwheeler at startext.co.uk> gpg key 01269BEB @ the.earth.li
- Previous message: Debian 3.0
- Next message: Debian 3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
