Because XFS is BETTER (Re: opinion on XFS)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caWed May 8 21:03:06 PDT 2002
- Previous message: Because XFS is BETTER (Re: opinion on XFS)
- Next message: Because XFS is BETTER (Re: opinion on XFS)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I don't think it would be fair to say "ext2 is good because lots of red hat > users use it" without ever having experienced XFS. I'll underline that. that's stupid. whether I've experienced XFS has absolutely no bearing on the issue here, which is your insinuation that ext2/3 is a problem. the fact is that ext2/3 works without complaint in at least 100x as many installations as any other Linux FS. probably more like 1000x. please: does anyone have any factual comparison to offer? performance?
- Previous message: Because XFS is BETTER (Re: opinion on XFS)
- Next message: Because XFS is BETTER (Re: opinion on XFS)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list