opinion on XFS
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eray Ozkural erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.trTue May 7 11:51:43 PDT 2002
- Previous message: opinion on XFS
- Next message: opinion on XFS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Yudong, On Tuesday 07 May 2002 18:28, Yudong Tian wrote: > Hello, > Has anyone tested the water of using SGI's XFS on a Linux cluster Can > you kindly share any experience and insights? I haven't made an analysis of what needs to be done to merge XFS into the kernel mainline but I have a feeling it is not prohitibive. I have been running the 32 node Beowulf at bilkent cs dept. and my personal computers with XFS for the last 6-7 months. It has operated perfectly, I have not observed a single reliability or performance bug that will influence the parallel system. On the contrary, the uptime and reliability of our system has improved significantly. We used to suffer crashed nodes due to the extremely poorly written EXT2 filesystem. That was the only system level bug that interrupted our work. Since I modified our installation scripts to format local drives with XFS, everything has changed. I think the required maintenance time has decreased considerably. They haven't called me for the last couple of months :) -- Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.tr> Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo Malfunction: http://mp3.com/ariza GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
- Previous message: opinion on XFS
- Next message: opinion on XFS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
