Dolphin Wulfkit
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joachim Worringen joachim at lfbs.RWTH-Aachen.DEWed May 1 10:19:23 PDT 2002
- Previous message: More Tyan S2466 Issues
- Next message: Help for using OpenPBS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kevin Van Workum wrote: > > I know this has been discussed before, but I'd like to know the "current" > opinion. What are your experiences with the Dolphin Wulfkit interconnect? > Any major issues (compatability/linux7.2/MPI/etc)? General comments. Oh oh, this is a sensitive topic. I'll try to give my modest opinion and some personal experiences... Wulfkit is a very solid, high-quality MPI implementation on top of a well-performing interconnect - and it's highly optimized for this interconnect. It includes a more or less full featured cluster environment software to monitor and manage your cluster. From my personal experiences, it is very stable and performs well, however, I am not really an application developer/user, but an MPI developer. To compare Wulfkit (SCI + ScaMPI) with "the other" well-known (probably better known) cluster interconnect (Myrinet2000 + MPICH-GM), I have put results of some PMB runs on a P4-i860 cluster with both, SCI and Myrinet, at http://www.lfbs.rwth-aachen.de/users/joachim/pmb_results . Please note that the i860 is quite a bad chipset for both SCI and Myrinet as it has disappointing PCI performance for DMA and PIO as well (relative to the performance potential of 64bit/66Mhz PCI). Anyway, look at the numbers if you are interested. I really don't want to discuss the relevance of such benchmarks and the type of the test platform (again); anybody is free to interprete them at it's own standard, requirements and experience. Of course, there is also a nice open-source no-cost MPI on top of the same hardware (SCI-MPICH, which I have written ;-)); for more info see URL in signature. This performs also quite nice and has a number of unique features ScaMPI/Wulfkit does not have. But I need to say that it surely isn't as well tested as ScaMPI is, and it is just an MPI and no cluster environment. Joachim -- | _ RWTH| Joachim Worringen |_|_`_ | Lehrstuhl fuer Betriebssysteme, RWTH Aachen | |_)(_`| http://www.lfbs.rwth-aachen.de/~joachim |_)._)| fon: ++49-241-80.27609 fax: ++49-241-80.22339
- Previous message: More Tyan S2466 Issues
- Next message: Help for using OpenPBS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
