MPI over ATM help or how-to?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Gerry Creager N5JXS gerry at cs.tamu.eduSat Mar 30 15:11:34 PST 2002
- Previous message: MPI over ATM help or how-to?
- Next message: DHCP Help
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marketting types, setting cost-per-port for ATM at 4x GBE and 20x 100BaseT effectively killed ATM for LAN and SAN. It's still viable for operations that benefit from connection-oriented operations, in the case of this forum, that being the Grid initiatives. I don't see ATM returning to the LAN forefront. I see GBE to the desktop and MPLS-based protocols surging ahead of it. That said, I suspect that after a foray into packet-based protocols without ensured sessions connectivity the carriers will return to ATM or MPLS with DiffServ-based QoS. But then again, I'm really an ATM bigot... gerry -- joachim at lfbs.rwth-aachen.de wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 09:13:19AM -0500, Lechner, David wrote: > > > > > I am trying to do a comparison for customers that use ATM now - our goal is > > > to demonstrate the performance improvement in running native and optimized > > > FE communications vs. ATM (the cost savings is obvious) - > > > > I looked on the web and the only "native" ATM MPI implementation I see > > is MetaMPICH, which seems to have gone defunct before delivering the > > ATM part. So you are stuck with IP emulation over ATM, which is > > probably never faster than fast ethernet. > > MetaMPICH (which I was involved with) was designed to couple > distributed MPI machines (T3E and SP2, in this case) via WAN > (4 x 622Mbit ATM, in this case). Therefore, we needed to use > multiple message routers on each machine. This worked quite well > for certain classes of applications (coupled simulations). > > It is no "native" > ATM usage in the sense that two processes directly exchange > data via ATM. ATM for LAN or even SAN usage is quite dead, as > I see it. > > Joachim > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf -- Gerry Creager -- gerry at cs.tamu.edu Network Engineering Academy for Advanced Telecommunications and Learning Technologies Texas A&M University 979.458.4020 (Phone) -- 979.847.8578 (Fax)
- Previous message: MPI over ATM help or how-to?
- Next message: DHCP Help
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
