FW: MPI cases and PVM
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Donald Becker becker at scyld.comFri Mar 22 15:43:41 PST 2002
- Previous message: FW: MPI cases and PVM
- Next message: FW: MPI cases and PVM
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Patrick Geoffray wrote: > Daniel Kidger wrote: > > > However the biggest problem with layering on top of TCPIP is the issue of > > latency. > > Right, and CPU load. TCP/IP is very hungry, having a machine on its knee > just moving data is not very usefull for something else. To amplify this message, TCP/IP overhead is increasing over time. We have smarter NICs with hardware checksum and TCP packetization offload, but new features such as IP chains, bandwidth throttling and anti-denial-of-service have added greatly to the CPU work per packet and cache impact of traversing the network stack. Even if you don't use IP chains, some of the overhead is still there. TCP/IP is still an excellent protocol, and the overhead isn't bad for 1KB+ packets, but feature creep and security requirements have added middle-aged "love handles" on it. And IPv6 will just encourage an eating binge. [[ Oohhhh, bad middle-aged weight gain analogy. ]] -- Donald Becker becker at scyld.com Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com 410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Second Generation Beowulf Clusters Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993
- Previous message: FW: MPI cases and PVM
- Next message: FW: MPI cases and PVM
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
