CCL:LAM-MPI vs. MPI-CH on LINUX (summary) (fwd)

[Eugene Leitl]

-- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
______________________________________________________________
ICBMTO: N48 04'14.8'' E11 36'41.2'' http://www.leitl.org
57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 15:44:01 +0100
From: Christoph van Wüllen <Christoph.vanWullen at tu-berlin.de>
To: chemistry at ccl.net
Subject: CCL:LAM-MPI vs. MPI-CH on LINUX (summary)

A while ago I asked for experiences with LAM-MPI vs. MPICH on a LINUX cluster.
I got few responses, all of which were in favour of LAM-MPI. The poor
stability of MPI-CH was mentioned throughout, and there were strong
statements indicating that LAM-MPI outperforms MPI-CH substantially.
Since LAM-MPI is already on the installation medium in my LINUX distribution
(SuSE), I just forget about MPICH for the moment.

+---------------------------------+----------------------------------+
| Prof. Christoph van Wüllen      | Tele-Phone (+49) (0)30 314 27870 |
| Technische Universität Sekr. C3 | Tele-Fax   (+49) (0)30 314 23727 |
| Straße des 17. Juni 135         | eMail                            |
| D-10623 Berlin, Germany         | Christoph.vanWullen at TU-Berlin.De |
+---------------------------------+----------------------------------+


-= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
CHEMISTRY at ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST at ccl.net -- To Admins
MAILSERV at ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
CHEMISTRY-SEARCH at ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl at osc.edu