DUAL CPU board vs 2 Single CPU boards: bang for buck?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Fraser fraser5 at cox.netThu Mar 7 04:24:08 PST 2002
- Previous message: MPI without master node on Scyld
- Next message: DUAL CPU board vs 2 Single CPU boards: bang for buck?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I don't desire to start a flame but it seems to me that for computational intensive and memory intensive work that 2 singles are better and in most cases cheaper then a dual setup. The dual SMP systems out there now have to fight for bandwidth along the same bus. The AMD chips while fast appear to be starved for data when *big* memory jobs are running. Further I don't see the cost benefits, if you actually dig into the "bang-for-buck" duals never seem to win. The only significant benefit I see from dual is less hardware and higher computing density, that may be reason enough to go with duals esp. if your application does not require a lot of memory fetches. Jim Fraser
- Previous message: MPI without master node on Scyld
- Next message: DUAL CPU board vs 2 Single CPU boards: bang for buck?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
