ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Maurice Hilarius maurice at harddata.comSat Jun 22 10:10:21 PDT 2002
- Previous message: PIV and PIII differences
- Next message: Tyan 2720 motherboard for Xeons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
With regards to your message at 10:01 AM 6/22/02, beowulf-request at beowulf.org. Where you stated: >Thomas, > >As I said in my original email I used PGI compilers (the code is a mixture >of F90 and C), it uses MPI, not OpenMP. > >This morning I already mentioned about my new tests, when I loaded both >processors in both Athlon and Xeon nodes. The load was done by running >mpirun -np 2. Both Myrinet and Gigabit ethernet gave approximately the >same timing which is what you would expect in the absence of internode >communication. > >I could not make comparison of scalability because I don't have more than >1 node available. > >My results remain unchanged: Xeon 2.2 GHz is 1.5 times faster than Xeon XP >2100+. > >Ivan I suggest you try the Intel compiler. With our best regards, Maurice W. Hilarius Telephone: 01-780-456-9771 Hard Data Ltd. FAX: 01-780-456-9772 11060 - 166 Avenue mailto:maurice at harddata.com Edmonton, AB, Canada http://www.harddata.com/ T5X 1Y3 Ask me about the UP1500 Alpha - Full systems from $3,500!
- Previous message: PIV and PIII differences
- Next message: Tyan 2720 motherboard for Xeons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
