ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at keyresearch.comThu Jun 20 10:15:10 PDT 2002
- Previous message: ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
- Next message: Need Some Help !!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 09:15:21AM -0500, Richard Walsh wrote: > Moreover, I am pretty that RDRAM actually has lower average latency > under load than SDRAM. No. It depends on the load. RAMBUS' problem has always been that it could raise bandwidth under ideal circumstances, but that its random access latency was worse than normal memory. This has been true in every RAMBUS generation. greg
- Previous message: ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
- Next message: Need Some Help !!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list