ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Ivan Oleynik oleynik at chuma.cas.usf.eduWed Jun 19 17:55:05 PDT 2002
- Previous message: ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
- Next message: ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark, Does it mean that there is no way to get more from Athlons even using the fastest CPU for this particular application? Since I am not an expert in computer architectures I would appreciate more details about importance of sustained, sequential dram bandwidth for numerically intensive calculations. Ivan ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Mark Hahn wrote: > > What I found is that Xeon 2.2 GHz is 1.5 times faster! than any athlons I > > tested. But the most strange thing is all these athlons: MP 1200, MP 1900, > > MP 2100 give approximately the same timing within 5%. This is completely > > above my comprehension. > > > > Did someone encounter such a strange pattern and what can be a source of > > this behavior? > > you have successfully measured sustained, sequential dram bandwidth ;) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ivan I. Oleynik E-mail : oleynik at chuma.cas.usf.edu Department of Physics University of South Florida 4202 East Fowler Avenue Tel : (813) 974-8186 Tampa, Florida 33620-5700 Fax : (813) 974-5813 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
- Next message: ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
