Problems with dual Athlons (cyl > 1024)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Michael Stein mas at ucla.eduWed Jul 31 16:52:47 PDT 2002
- Previous message: Problems with dual Athlons
- Next message: Problems with dual Athlons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> If you insist on staying with lilo for the time being, the only solution > I know of is to create a boot partition that is < 1024 cylinders. Of > course, to do this you probably have to reinstall (well, you don't HAVE > to if you are comfortable repartitioning a functioning drive) and you > may as well reinstall into 7.3. This limit is inherited from decades > ago, BTW, and it is high time it is consigned to the hell of ancient > ideas that weren't so bright in the long run. (Nobody will EVER be able > to make a disk with 2^10 cylinders, so this is plenty...;-) Times have changed. I've seen/have machines where lilo will boot a boot partition above the cylinder 1024 "boundary". One in particular (I tested it) was a ASUS A7V266-E motherboard AMD machine. Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 7297 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 1 574 4610623+ 83 Linux /dev/hda2 575 1148 4610655 83 Linux /dev/hda3 1149 1722 4610655 83 Linux /dev/hda4 1723 7297 44781187+ 5 Extended /dev/hda5 1723 1977 2048256 82 Linux swap Three separate installs in hda1, hda2, hda3. On this machine hda3 will boot (lilo in mbr, RedHat 7.2). Possibly the RedHat installer might not like this, but lilo (and the bios) seem to manage it. YMMV.
- Previous message: Problems with dual Athlons
- Next message: Problems with dual Athlons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
