Optimal number of nfsd? [was: Re: OT:nfs hangs with redhat 7.3]
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Martin Siegert siegert at sfu.caMon Jul 29 14:02:26 PDT 2002
- Previous message: Optimal number of nfsd? [was: Re: OT:nfs hangs with redhat 7.3]
- Next message: Optimal number of nfsd? [was: Re: OT:nfs hangs with redhat 7.3]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 12:55:12PM -0700, ulairi wrote: > Quoting Jim Meyer <purp at wildbrain.com>: > > > Hello! > > > > > # Number of servers to be started by default > > > RPCNFSDCOUNT=36 > > > > Here's an excellent question: how does one calculate the optimal number > > of nfsd processes to have lying about? > > > > Thanks! > > Best rule of thumb I've ever seen was nfsd per CPU. I have a hard time believing that that is a good setting for a 1000 processor beowulf cluster. A more appropriate way of finding out how to set the number of nfsd processes was given here on this list on May 6 by Jean-Christophe Ducom: http://www.beowulf.org/pipermail/beowulf/2002-May/003447.html Cheers, Martin ======================================================================== Martin Siegert Academic Computing Services phone: (604) 291-4691 Simon Fraser University fax: (604) 291-4242 Burnaby, British Columbia email: siegert at sfu.ca Canada V5A 1S6 ========================================================================
- Previous message: Optimal number of nfsd? [was: Re: OT:nfs hangs with redhat 7.3]
- Next message: Optimal number of nfsd? [was: Re: OT:nfs hangs with redhat 7.3]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
