Optimal number of nfsd? [was: Re: OT:nfs hangs with redhat 7.3]
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
ulairi ulairi at ulairi.orgMon Jul 29 12:55:12 PDT 2002
- Previous message: Optimal number of nfsd? [was: Re: OT:nfs hangs with redhat 7.3]
- Next message: Optimal number of nfsd? [was: Re: OT:nfs hangs with redhat 7.3]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Quoting Jim Meyer <purp at wildbrain.com>: > Hello! > > > # Number of servers to be started by default > > RPCNFSDCOUNT=36 > > Here's an excellent question: how does one calculate the optimal number > of nfsd processes to have lying about? > > Thanks! Best rule of thumb I've ever seen was nfsd per CPU. -- "To achieve victory when it is within the ken of the common herd is not the acme of excellence. Nor is it the true acme of excellence when you win and the whole empire says, "Well done!". True excellence is to plan secretly, to move surreptitiously, to foil the enemy's plans and to balk his schemes, so that at the end, the day is won without shedding a drop of blood. Sun Tzu, The Art of War. [6th Century. B.C.E.]"
- Previous message: Optimal number of nfsd? [was: Re: OT:nfs hangs with redhat 7.3]
- Next message: Optimal number of nfsd? [was: Re: OT:nfs hangs with redhat 7.3]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
