E7500 Chipset
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Don Holmgren djholm at fnal.govFri Jul 19 09:56:02 PDT 2002
- Previous message: E7500 Chipset
- Next message: E7500 Chipset
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Myrinet bandwidth on E7500 is considerably better than an i860. For
gm_allsize, large message bandwidths are about 240 MB/sec vs 165 MB/sec.
For netpipe over mpich-gm, large message bandwidths are about 225 MB/sec
vs 155 MB/sec. Below 1K-byte message sizes the performance are
essentially identical. Graphs are here:
http://qcdhome.fnal.gov/benchmarks/e7500.html
Don Holmgren
On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 09:25:44PM +0900, Iwao Makino wrote:
>
> > Good memory bandwidth, perhaps i860 chipset base is good idea, but be careful,
> > if you want to get
> > PCI bus performance from them, DON'T USE i860 based board.
> >
> > Here's good reason:
>
> That reason is true; however, it doesn't seem to hurt the bandwidth
> that Myrinet gets across the PCI. This was discussed at length on this
> list a while ago.
>
> http://www.conservativecomputer.com/myrinet/perf.html
>
> -- greg
- Previous message: E7500 Chipset
- Next message: E7500 Chipset
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
