Company computer utilization?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Erik Paulson epaulson at cs.wisc.eduWed Jul 17 12:36:47 PDT 2002
- Previous message: Company computer utilization?
- Next message: Company computer utilization?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:49:16AM -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:41:33PM -0500, Erik Paulson wrote: > > > Or wait a few months, and use User-Mode-Linux on Win32, and just run the > > Linux binaries. Use Condor to locate idle machines and temporarily install > > "Linux" > > Interesting. Clearly that'll work great for embarrassingly parallel > programs, but what about MPI? Is there significant overhead in UML on > Win32 for the ethernet? > System calls are fairly painful under UML - the Linux version uses ptrace to create the virtual machine. We may be able to come up with something less painful under Win32 (for all it's detractors, the Win32 API has some really cool calls) I don't think UML is going to be a solution for people who are concerned about squeezing every last byte out of their network cards, but for codes with low to medium communications overhead it shouldn't be too bad. -Erik
- Previous message: Company computer utilization?
- Next message: Company computer utilization?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
