sram, not sdram.
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caThu Jan 31 08:22:58 PST 2002
- Previous message: sram, not sdram.
- Next message: notes on new power mac (was Re: clusters v SMP)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > personally, 2M seems strangely small for DDR, since it's not > > either fast or wide. > > It's an L3, so that's DDR *sram*, not DDR SDRAM. Another system using no, apple says sdram: http://www.apple.com/powermac/architecture.html the numbers check, too: it's just your basic pc2100 ddr, giving a genuine marketing bandwidth of 4.2 GB/s total.
- Previous message: sram, not sdram.
- Next message: notes on new power mac (was Re: clusters v SMP)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list