clusters v SMP
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Ricky Rankin r.rankin at qub.ac.ukMon Jan 28 12:11:51 PST 2002
- Previous message: Scyld and User Mode Linux ?
- Next message: clusters v SMP
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At Queen's we hope to have abot £300K to spend on a new facility. We currently have a Sun 3500 with 6 processors and 6GB of memory and a 48 Node IBM SP. At one stage we had thought that the budget would be around £150K and had been looking for a Linux Cluster, however with more money potentially available and having had presentations from IBM and SGI with Sun and Compaq to follow we are now completely confused. The 4GB memory restriction of an Intel node would be too restrictive for some of our users. The majority I suspect are still running single processor jobs while we have several users who can exploit parallel architectures. Some advice on the pros and cons of the different architectures would be appreciated - we are looking for a central production system and not one that is owned by a department. Thanks Ricky ---------------------- Ricky Rankin Principal Analyst Computing Services Queen's University Belfast tel: 02890 273819 fax: 02890 230592 email: r.rankin at qub.ac.uk
- Previous message: Scyld and User Mode Linux ?
- Next message: clusters v SMP
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
