cluster frustrations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joachim Worringen joachim at lfbs.RWTH-Aachen.DEWed Jan 16 10:36:09 PST 2002
- Previous message: cluster frustrations
- Next message: cluster frustrations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Lindgren wrote: > A reference showing how many OTHER people can manage to install clusters: > http://Beowulf-underground.org/success.html > proving I must be the village idiot. ;-) I'm quite confident that you're not the vi. I bet that 30% of those "success stories" already ceased to exist as such, 50% are having similar problems to yours and 20% are running "perfectly". I.e., I use a cluster (9 Quad-Xeon nodes) which the computing centre here in Jülich has built and is maintaining. It runs stable. with kernel 2.2, Myrinet and GM 1.1.3 - but with really unsatisfactory (communication) performance. But they don't get it to run reliably with the current Linux/GM/MPICH versions which of course should run faster, better, nicer. I don't blame Linux or Myrinet for these problems - I just want to show that even people capable of running Crays, SP-2s, Paragon, any kind of workstatons etc. have a hard time setting up and maintaining a Linux cluster. And the next update is usually the next nightmare. Joachim -- | _ RWTH| Joachim Worringen |_|_`_ | Lehrstuhl fuer Betriebssysteme, RWTH Aachen | |_)(_`| http://www.lfbs.rwth-aachen.de/~joachim |_)._)| fon: ++49-241-80.27609 fax: ++49-241-80.22339
- Previous message: cluster frustrations
- Next message: cluster frustrations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
