RSH scaling problems...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at keyresearch.comTue Dec 17 08:42:35 PST 2002
- Previous message: RSH scaling problems...
- Next message: RSH scaling problems...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 06:09:07AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > So, even if you patch the kernel to give you more than 256 ptys, > you also need to patch rcmd() to use a wider range of ports (at least > in theory). > Any comments? rcmd must use low ports, for security reasons. ssh has a mode in which it can use a high port. That's how the 370-node FSL system did it in 1999. This technique also worked OK on Cplant at 1200 nodes. -- greg
- Previous message: RSH scaling problems...
- Next message: RSH scaling problems...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
