Hyperthreading in P4
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rocky McGaugh rocky at atipa.comMon Apr 29 16:09:08 PDT 2002
- Previous message: Hyperthreading in P4
- Next message: Attachmants (was: Hyperthreading in P4)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Steve Gaudet wrote: > > Key issues are: > 1. Code must be threaded. > 2. BIOS and O.S. must be enabled. > - RH has a patch available on their site. > > As for the performance vs PIII, I strongly recommend that application > developers use our C and Fortran compilers for Linux. GCC is not > well-optimized for Netburst architecture, PGI is o.k., and our compilers > really fly! In addition, our compilers generate the best code for PIII, > AMD, and P4P/Xeon based systems so you really can't lose. > > Pls see the following Hyper-Threading whitepaper (preliminary) for all the > gory details about req'ts.> > > Fine and dandy. The problem is with no way to bind processes to processors, it's quite easy for 2 heavy processes (or threads) to migrate to the same physical CPU, leaving 2 smaller threads (or processes) on the other physical CPU. For CPU bound apps, its too unpredictable without the processor affinity stuff. -- Rocky McGaugh Atipa Technologies rocky at atipatechnologies.com rmcgaugh at atipa.com 1-785-841-9513 x3110 http://1087800222/ perl -e 'print unpack(u, ".=W=W+F%T:7\!A+F-O;0H`");'
- Previous message: Hyperthreading in P4
- Next message: Attachmants (was: Hyperthreading in P4)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
