very high bandwidth, low latency manner?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comFri Apr 12 08:17:08 PDT 2002
- Previous message: very high bandwidth, low latency manner?
- Next message: very high bandwidth, low latency manner?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Steffen Persvold wrote: > True, but if one of your Myrinet switches breaks down you loose 64 nodes > in a 256 node system (standard "CLOS" configuration). I don't know the > MBTF for Myrinet switches, but I would expect it to be rather high > (redundant power supplies ?). The calculated MTBF of the switches is +50 years. Actually, if all 6 fans go off, it will still work, then the switch will drop more and more packets, then the uC will shutdown the blades one by one if they reach the critical temperature limit. If there is a failure on a blade itself, it will affect only 8 ports. If there is a failure in a crossbar on the backplane, the mapper will use a redondant route (as many redondant routes as crossbars, so a failure in each 8 crossbars on the backplane is required to loose all ports). Chuck made a very nice talk at Cluster2001 about Clos topology. It presents thing very clearly, I like it a lot: http://www.cacr.caltech.edu/cluster2001/program/talks/seitz.pdf Regards. Patrick ---------------------------------------------------------- | Patrick Geoffray, Ph.D. patrick at myri.com | Myricom, Inc. http://www.myri.com | Cell: 865-389-8852 685 Emory Valley Rd (B) | Phone: 865-425-0978 Oak Ridge, TN 37830 ----------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: very high bandwidth, low latency manner?
- Next message: very high bandwidth, low latency manner?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
