[PBS-USERS] Re: Any experience with SCore?

[Eray Ozkural (exa)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 30 October 2001 18:32, Yong Duan wrote:
> Tends to over rate the lower-end clusters. It wouldn't make much difference
> if you use 10BT (or even shoe strings for that matter). Communication is
> basically not counted in the benchmark. Useful for certain type of
> applications, useless for most ...
>

Could you elaborate? It certainly looks better than LAM where we have latency 
in terms of miliseconds rather than microseconds. ;)

Are you telling me that I wouldn't have any improvement in my code if I 
switched from LAM/MPI to SCoop mpich implementation?

Thanks,

- -- 
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B  EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7393UfAeuFodNU5wRAksBAJ9j15rlWxhgQkIa9Fsk98rULj+84gCgop1F
hdxBTqe/DUw6jihAUPANkTM=
=yMR+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----