Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at conservativecomputer.comThu Oct 18 10:43:11 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
- Next message: Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Anyone have experience with these high speed network devices? I'm > starting out with a 32 node cluster doing bioinformatics. The jobs will > be high I/O probably through NFS, thus the need for some high speed > connectivity between the nodes. Note that if you aren't using NFS, the answer can be very different. Let's say, for example, that instead of reading your databases via NFS, you copy them to your local disk using the "gmcp" program (which doesn't exist yet, but it works like rcp, only it uses gm). "gmcp" should have much lower overhead than NFS or rcp, so your networking might stop being the bottleneck, and instead your disks could be the bottleneck. As for systems actually using GM over NFS in production, the FSL system in Boulder does. Craig Tierney got it working, and I think they're happy with the stability. greg
- Previous message: Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
- Next message: Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
