Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at conservativecomputer.comThu Oct 18 09:25:14 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
- Next message: Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 11:21:05AM -0400, Donald Becker wrote: > Giganet is apparently being repositioned by Emulex as a niche product. > In an interesting move, Emulex is instead promoting a programmable > gigabit Ethernet adapter as a SCSI-over-IP host channel adapter. > http://wwwip.emulex.com/ip/index.html Before Giganet was purchased, they had already moved away form building hardware to instead building software that ran on normal gigE adapters. This Emulex thing is that product. Emulex would never have paid all that money for VIA hardware. They claim to be able to do 1 Gb/s iSCSI transfers at less than 10% host CPU overhead. A conventional gigE driver eats what, 50% of the cpu? g
- Previous message: Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
- Next message: Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
