Channel Bonding Question
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew Klaassen ak at dkp.comWed Nov 28 13:19:58 PST 2001
- Previous message: Channel Bonding Question
- Next message: Channel Bonding Question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:25:39AM -0500,
I wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 09:29:18AM -0600,
> Jared Hodge wrote:
> > I was wondering if it is possible to link two ethernet NICs
> > (channel bonding, sort of) on our server to work together
> > talking to a single switch. I've lately come to realize that
> > most work with channel bonding requires two entirely separate
> > networks, but what I want to do is connect the two NICs two
> > the switch (Cisco Catalyst) and allow it to effectively
> > communicate with two of the nodes at full speed at the same
> > time. I guess that this would be more along the lines of line
> > trunking or multi-link or some other networking scheme. If
> > anyone knows of any links that describe how to do this, I
> > would appreciate it. Thanks.
> No link, but here are the config files we need in order to make
> this work on a Redhat box...
<snip>
Ah - I had a chance to look through the Redhat startup scripts,
and it looks like all you need on the Linux box side of things
is ifenslave. From the ifenslave manpage:
# modprobe bonding
# ifconfig bond0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0
# ifenslave bond0 eth0 eth1
Hope that helps.
Andrew Klaassen
- Previous message: Channel Bonding Question
- Next message: Channel Bonding Question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
