Fortran compilers for Linux/mpich
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Don Holmgren djholm at fnal.govFri Nov 23 11:10:59 PST 2001
- Previous message: Fortran compilers for Linux/mpich
- Next message: Fortran compilers for Linux/mpich
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Craig Tierney wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 02:46:38PM +0100, Steven Berukoff wrote: > > > > Yes, you can use the Intel compilers to compile code for Athlons. Since > > the AMD instruction set supports SSE, you can include Pentium 3 > > optimizations that improve performance a bit. > > Does anyone know how similar/different are the SSE instructions > are implemented Athlon vs. P3/P4 chips? Are the operational counts > the same or is one slower than he other? > At the very bottom of the page, http://qcdhome.fnal.gov/sse/ I have a table with cycle counts posted for a number of matrix-matrix and matrix-vector routines as measured on a P-III (Coppermine), P4, and an Athlon MP. Times are posted for both a pure-C version of each routine, built with gcc, as well as for an SSE version. The sources for each are available at http://qcdhome.fnal.gov/sse/catalog.html The results are a mixed bag, with each flavor processor sometimes first, second, or third. I'm using only a small subset of SSE - mostly shufps, addps, mulps, with a few xops, movaps, and movups thrown in. I haven't timed individual instructions on all three processors. Don Holmgren Fermilab
- Previous message: Fortran compilers for Linux/mpich
- Next message: Fortran compilers for Linux/mpich
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
