Promise SX6000 vs Adaptec 2400A
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kian_Chang_Low at vdgc.com.sg Kian_Chang_Low at vdgc.com.sgThu Nov 8 00:04:44 PST 2001
- Previous message: HPL residual check failure
- Next message: Scyld iso image
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
Thanks for the info.
I was wondering whether anyone in the list has experience with either the
Promise or the Adaptec cards and would like to share their experience?
Especially with drivers for the newer kernel.
Thanks,
Kian Chang.
Joshua
Baker-LePain To: <Kian_Chang_Low at vdgc.com.sg>
<jlb17 at duke.edu cc: <beowulf at beowulf.org>
> Subject: Re: Promise SX6000 vs Adaptec
Sent by: 2400A
beowulf-admin at b
eowulf.org
11/08/01 12:46
AM
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001 at 12:01am, Kian_Chang_Low at vdgc.com.sg wrote
> With 3ware existing the IDE raid storage card market, I was looking for a
> replacement for a cluster and came across the Promise Supertrak SX6000
and
> Adaptec ATA RAID 2400A.
FWIW, someone with a *lot* of interest in big storage systems recently
posted to the linux-ide-arrays list that 3ware have reversed their
decision and will be getting back into the IDE raid card business
(including releasing the 7850 RSN). A press release is supposed to be
forthcoming. The Escalade pages are already back up.
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: HPL residual check failure
- Next message: Scyld iso image
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
