PGI and Scyld
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at conservativecomputer.comMon May 21 11:43:02 PDT 2001
- Previous message: PGI and Scyld
- Next message: PGI and Scyld
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 12:49:04PM -0500, jacobs wrote: > Now, however, we are moving on to the real stuff. Unfortunately, the > f77 code is not readily compiled by g77, however the PGI suite works > just fine. g77 does compile *most* f77 extensions and weirdnesses, you may not be picking the right flags. But PGI is a good choice, just because it's probably quite a bit faster. And with a cluster, faster means fewer nodes which saves money. > What are some of the trials and tribulations associated with running the > PGI compilers over BPROC. Why not compile on the master? Surely compilation time is much less than run time? -- g
- Previous message: PGI and Scyld
- Next message: PGI and Scyld
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list