ATLAS vs. Intel Math Kernel Library
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mattson, Timothy G timothy.g.mattson at intel.comThu May 17 18:07:47 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Remote boot w. PXE etc.
- Next message: [Fwd: AMD-based Beowulf cluster]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ole, The MKL librarires are worth the price since they are free. You can download them at no cost from the intel.developer web site. As for performance comparisons, its mixed. Sometimes Atlas is faster, sometimes MKL is faster. One factor in MKL's favor is its size --- MKL is a lot more than just the BLAS. It includes FFT's, LAPACK, and a very fast vector transcendental library. -Tim Mattson Intel Corp (not part of the MKL team, but close to them) -----Original Message----- From: Ole W. Saastad [mailto:ole at scali.no] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:46 AM To: beowulf at beowulf.org Subject: ATLAS vs. Intel Math Kernel Library How does the performance of ATLAS generated libraries compare to the Intel Math Kernel Library? Intel claim P4 support, but so does ATLAS. I would also like too see FFT in the ATLAS project. Fast FFT are always in demand! Is it worth the extra investment for the Intel package ? Ole W Saastad Scali AS. _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: Remote boot w. PXE etc.
- Next message: [Fwd: AMD-based Beowulf cluster]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
