Channel Bonding
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
JParker at coinstar.com JParker at coinstar.comWed Mar 28 13:44:17 PST 2001
- Previous message: Channel Bonding
- Next message: mpptest report errors on linux
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
G'Day !
Thank you for all your responses. In summary it sounds like the cheapest
and easiest way is to use (2) 8 port switches that are independent of each
other. (ie not uplinked).
Do they have to be switches or will a generic non-switching hub work ?
cheers,
Jim Parker
Sailboat racing is not a matter of life and death .... It is far more
important than that !!!
----- Forwarded by Jim Parker/Coinstar Inc/US on 03/28/01 01:47 PM -----
Jim Parker
03/28/01 09:24 AM
To: beowulf at beowulf.org
cc:
Subject: Channel Bonding
G'Day !
If I have 8 nodes each with (2) 100Mb Ethernet cards, and I want to use
channel bonding. Can I use (1) 16 port switch, or do I need (2) 8 ports ?
If I use the (2) 8 ports, do the switches need to be connected to each
other or are they isolated from each other ?
cheers,
Jim Parker
Sailboat racing is not a matter of life and death .... It is far more
important than that !!!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20010328/b2eb6743/attachment.html
- Previous message: Channel Bonding
- Next message: mpptest report errors on linux
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
